Systems thinking is an approach that views problems as part of a whole. It studies links among components of the system. Isolated issues are not the main focus of systems thinking.
Government policy often deals with complex, interconnected challenges. Old methods sometimes ignore how issues are related. Policymakers can understand more with systems thinking.
Root causes become clearer with this method. This leads to more effective solutions. It also helps avoid unintended consequences.
Systems thinking fosters interdepartmental cooperation. It breaks down silos in government organizations. Communication is better with this collaborative approach.
Government policies are improved by this approach. Effects of decisions are easier to predict. The approach fosters sustainable government policies.
This method is gaining popularity among governments. It supports innovation and adaptation in a changing world. Systems thinking is valuable for tackling complex policy issues.
Governments adapt better using this approach. Lessons from history are more useful with this method. Policies can change and adapt more easily.
Government responses are more robust. It spots risks in advance. It supports strategic planning.
This approach encourages the use of feedback and evaluation. Government can adapt policies as needed. Policies become better through this process.
It applies to every part of policy creation. Every policy phase can use systems thinking. Policies stay up-to-date and useful.
It encourages citizen participation. Governments can meet more needs. Inclusive policies are created.
Governments move beyond outdated methods. Past errors are less likely to recur. Learning becomes central to government.
Hard-to-solve problems are managed. Flexible thinking is promoted. Climate and health issues are addressed.
Diverse views are included. Different people contribute. It results in well-rounded policies.
Staff may need new abilities. Skill building is important. It equips staff for challenges.
Systems thinking can help governments manage limited resources. It helps identify the most effective interventions. Money is spent efficiently.
Accurate assessment is possible. It supports measurable objectives. Results are more transparent.
Transparency is improved. Public conversations are encouraged. Policies gain public trust.
Government policy is improved by systems thinking. It creates more effective, resilient, and inclusive solutions. Systems thinking is recommended for all policies.
join our online event to explore the basics of systems thinking and why it
increased systems thinking capacity—that is, the capacity to consider systemic effects of policies and actions—is necessary for translating knowledge on sustainable development goals’ (sdgs) interactions into practice. various models and tools that seek to support more evidence-based policy-making have been developed with the purpose of exploring system effects across sdgs. however, these often lack integration of behavioral aspects and contextual factors that influence the decision-making process. we analyze three applications of a decision-support approach called sdg synergies, which aims at building capacity in systems thinking among decision-makers and implementing agencies. our objective is to explore how behavior and context influences whether and how knowledge is taken up and acted upon when making decisions. drawing on empirical material from mongolia, colombia, and sri lanka, we identify three sets of mechanisms that appear important for enabling more systemic thinking: system boundaries (time, scale, and space), rules of engagement (ownership, representation, and purpose), and biases (confirmation biases and participation biases). results highlight some key challenges for systemic thinking that merit further attention in future applications, including the importance of localizing sdgs and incorporating this knowledge to national-level assessments, an unwillingness of stakeholders to acknowledge trade-offs, the challenge of addressing transformational as opposed to incremental change, and striking a balance between the flexibility of the approach vis-à-vis scientific robustness.
in a world of rapid change and complex challenges, governments are increasingly recognizing the need to think ahead, plan better, and work together. the ministry of finance, national planning and trade of seychelles realized the potential of strategic foresight and systems thinking for adopting a more integrated approach to strategic planning. what started as a collaboration between the government of seychelles, the resident coordinator office (rco) for mauritius and seychelles in 2022, the united nations department of economic and social affairs (un desa), and unitar, is gradually evolving into a way of working for the ministry.
systems thinking very much has a role to play across all government priorities.
this blog launches “systemic” – a game that simulates how policy-making systems function and possible shifts that can be made to improve policy outcomes. systemic has been inspired by the world of board games, and was co-created by policy lab
a systems thinking approach is essential for public health policy development, offering a framework to navigate the dynamic complexities inherent in public health issues. this methodology enables policymakers to comprehend the interconnections ...
systems thinking provides new ways of seeing the world, focusing attention on the relationship between elements in complex systems and the spaces inbetween. haynes study shows that many policy-makers valued systems thinking as a new way to approach ...
explore the idea of systems thinking as a new model for government; a new way of doing, certainly, but also a new way of thinking and being.
cross-industry support for a new systems thinking report will help the built environment sector to deliver joined-up approaches with better results for people, places and planet, says mott macdonald’s global cities lead and fellow, clare wildfire.
background there is increasing interest in using systems thinking to tackle ‘wicked’ policy problems in preventive health, but this can be challenging for policy-makers because the literature is amorphous and often highly theoretical. little is known about how best to support health policy-makers to gain skills in understanding and applying systems thinking for policy action. methods in-depth interviews were conducted with 18 policy-makers who are participating in an australian research collaboration that uses a systems approach. our aim was to explore factors that support policy-makers to use systems approaches, and to identify any impacts of systems thinking on policy thinking or action, including the pathways through which these impacts occurred. results all 18 policy-makers agreed that systems thinking has merit but some questioned its practical policy utility. a small minority were confused about what systems thinking is or which approaches were being used in the collaboration. the majority were engaged with systems thinking and this group identified concrete impacts on their work. they reported using systems-focused research, ideas, tools and resources in policy work that were contributing to the development of practical methodologies for policy design, scaling up, implementation and evaluation; and to new prevention narratives. importantly, systems thinking was helping some policy-makers to reconceptualise health problems and contexts, goals, potential policy solutions and methods. in short, they were changing how they think about preventive health. conclusion these results show that researchers and policy-makers can put systems thinking into action as part of a research collaboration, and that this can result in discernible impacts on policy processes. in this case, action-oriented collaboration and capacity development over a 5-year period facilitated mutual learning and practical application. this indicates that policy-makers can get substantial applied value from systems thinking when they are involved in extended co-production processes that target policy impact and are supported by responsive capacity strategies.
browsing the daily news headlines might lead one to conclude that we live in an era ruled by populism, fear, and misinformation. in reality, over the past…
decisions in one realm have ripple effects in others. public programs need to reflect that reality.
in november 2022, the centre for science and policy delivered a series of policy workshops on how to apply systems thnking to policy making. these workshops brought together policy makers and experts to discuss health systems, physical infrastructure, and conflict.
systems thinking brings problems to the surface, making it easier for governments to collectively develop, influence and shape solutions, including in relation to grand missions, policy domains and governments themselves.
by catherine hobbs and gerald midgley. originally published on the integration and implementation in
systems thinking for better social policy: a case study in financial wellbeing
engineering expertise meets policymaking practice - explore raeng programmes like policy fellowships and system approaches in government that bring systems thinking to government challenges
last month we had a really interesting ibspn seminar on applications of systemic thinking to behaviour change. using a systems lens to explore behavioural challenges in policy development can lead to impactful and holistic policy solutions.
posts about systems thinking written by lancingfarrell
worldwide there is increasing interest in both academic and government sectors to evaluate the different impacts of electronic government (e-government) systems. a number of predictive, cause-effect, linearly and functionally oriented models of evaluation have been proposed and applied. the focus of...
the cecan 2024 conference ‘looking back and looking forward: closing the loop from evaluation to policy making’ considered the questions ‘what is the role of systems thinking in evaluation? is it the answer to wicked problems?’ in one of its breakout sessions.
a systems thinking approach to public health policy development is essential as it ensures there has been a thorough investigation into the dynamic complexit...
“the covid-19 pandemic has shown what governments can do when faced with an existential threat……”
there is much to be said for systems thinking or a systems-informed approach to key tasks such as evaluation. if the policy problem is complex, then we would not expect a single shot solution to wo…
by catherine hobbs why does public policy go wrong? how can researchers who are systems thinkers begin to create the conditions in which those involved in public policy may flourish within their po…
better decisions emerge when we think across systems - understanding how different policies influence health outcomes and economic vitality
systems thinking is a mental framework that helps us to become better problem solvers. it takes a systemic approach to solving complex issues.
interest in applying systems thinking (st) in public health and healthcare improvement has increased in the past decade, but its practical use is still uncle...
this article explores the importance of systems thinking as a mindset for designing, developing, procuring and delivering products, services, programs and policies, and how to apply it to product management.
new ideas for improving policy making cannot mask the shortfall in funding that many public services are facing.
systems thinking has seen growing popularity in current times. with world events such as the covid-19 pandemic, the ukraine war, the macro-economic uncertainty in the developed world, and the climate emergency, governments, industries, nonprofits, and education institutions have come to realize that
systems thinking, a holistic approach to problem-solving, offers a powerful lens to navigate today’s interconnected world,